← Search

Marnie Desmarteau

Littleton, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
122 matches · 71W–51L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Marnie Desmarteau to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history122 matches
W
2026-07-30 · KC-RH RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anita Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-16 · KC-RH RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sheila Gossen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-14 · KC-CC NAVY · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-12 · KC-RH RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anita Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-09 · KC-RH RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anita Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · KC-CC NAVY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kate LeClair
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-07-05 · LEBTC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bryan DesMarteau mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-28 · LEBTC TEAL · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andy Sexton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-23 · KC-CC NAVY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Graves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-22 · LEBTC TEAL · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andy Sexton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-16 · KC-CC NAVY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lana Banbury
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-28 · KC-RH GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sheila Gossen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
80%
4W–1L · 71.6% of games
3.5
70%
56W–24L · 57.9% of games
4.0
32.3%
10W–21L · 41.3% of games
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
40 matches
#1 Singles
25%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
15 matches
#2 Singles
6%
7 matches
#1 Female Singles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer