← Search

Anasa Shank

Centennial, CO
4.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
179 matches · 117W–62L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Anasa Shank to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history179 matches
W
2026-08-19 · SS-H TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Celine Ormond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-16 · LTFC RED · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Wes Anthony mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-12 · SS-H TEAL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nantida Hong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-09 · LTFC RED · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Wes Anthony mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-06 · LTFC GOLD · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jodi Little
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-04 · SS-H TEAL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Wade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
W
N/A
2026-08-02 · LTFC RED · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Fred Jasper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-23 · LTFC GOLD · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Plagenza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-21 · SS-H TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Wade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-19 · LTFC RED · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robert Wade mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · SS-LT YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Paulsson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-12 · LTFC RED · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Fred Jasper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
54.5%
12W–10L · 51.5% of games
3.5
80.6%
58W–14L · 60.2% of games
4.0
46.2%
18W–21L · 47.2% of games
7.0mixed
72.2%
13W–5L · 59.8% of games
7.5mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 48.8% of games
8.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 40.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
68 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
54 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
27 matches
#1 Singles
12%
22 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer