← Search

Nantida Hong

Highlands Ranch, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
214 matches · 131W–83L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nantida Hong to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history214 matches
L
2026-09-01 · SS-H TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Celine Ormond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-23 · RRTC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Timothy Burwell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-16 · RRTC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Timothy Burwell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-12 · SS-H TEAL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anasa Shank
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-11 · SS-H TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with VANESSA BERNAL
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-08-09 · RRTC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Timothy Burwell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-02 · RRTC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Timothy Burwell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-23 · HRCA-N YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Celine Ormond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-5
L
2026-07-19 · RRTC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Timothy Burwell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-16 · HRCA-N YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Celine Ormond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-09 · HRCA-N YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susana Wanken
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-07-07 · SS-LT YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynn Pearson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
50%
4W–4L · 43.7% of games
3.5
69.4%
86W–38L · 56.7% of games
4.0
43.5%
10W–13L · 45.4% of games
7.0mixed
76.2%
16W–5L · 58.5% of games
7.5mixed
17.6%
3W–14L · 40.8% of games
8.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 58.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
80 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
58 matches
#1 Singles
17%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
24 matches
#2 Singles
3%
7 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe