← Search

Jane Kufel

Stoughton, WI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
100 matches · 54W–46L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jane Kufel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history100 matches
L
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-21 · WI Adult 18&O 3.0W MALT Bradshaw · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharon Sweeney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-07 · WI Adult 55&O 7.0W MALT Neukirch · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joy Gander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-02 · WI Adult 40&O 3.0W MALT Bradshaw · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynn Boysen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-01-26 · WI Adult 40&O 3.0W MALT Bradshaw · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maureen Connors
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-19 · WI Adult 40&O 3.0W MALT Bradshaw · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Bradshaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-01-17 · WI Adult 55&O 7.0W MALT Neukirch · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maryjo Grimm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-01-10 · WI Adult 55&O 7.0W MALT Neukirch · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maryjo Grimm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
Ling Wu / Karelyn Hopkins
2026-01-05 · WI Adult 40&O 3.0W MALT Bradshaw · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maureen Connors
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
63.3%
19W–11L · 52.5% of games
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
68.2%
15W–7L · 57.6% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
36.4%
8W–14L · 46.1% of games
7.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 29.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
28 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams