← Search

Douglas Stuva

Omaha, NE
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
136 matches · 90W–46L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Douglas Stuva to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history136 matches
L
2026-08-25 · Stuva · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adam Gouttierre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-24 · Jensen · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with James Merrill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-17 · Jensen · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adam Gouttierre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-11 · Stuva · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adam Gouttierre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-3
L
2026-07-24 · Stuva · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kersten Higgins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-22 · Jank · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kendra McGinnis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-21 · Stuva · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth Kingston mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-07-09 · NEWC/Stuva/18&Over4.0M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josh Eveloff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-28 · Jank · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Rachel Miller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-25 · NEWC/Stuva/18&Over4.0M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josh Eveloff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-06-24 · Jensen · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Josh Eveloff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-19 · Stuva · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth Kingston mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
73.7%
14W–5L · 56.2% of games
3.5
50%
6W–6L · 43.5% of games
4.0
72.5%
29W–11L · 57% of games
4.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 46.7% of games
6.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 80.9% of games
7.0mixed
92.9%
13W–1L · 61.4% of games
8.0mixed
58.8%
20W–14L · 52.2% of games
9.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 31.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
49 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
28 matches
#1 Singles
8%
11 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal