← Search

Chase Petersen

Omaha, NE
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
113 matches · 69W–44L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Chase Petersen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history113 matches
W
2026-08-25 · Dixon · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Strasil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-08-11 · Dixon · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Douglas Cady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-24 · Erwin/Redding · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Libby Ruf mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-10 · Erwin/Redding · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shannon Gilroy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-01 · NE/Eglseder/18&Over4.5M · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tyler Osterloo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-19 · Erwin/Redding · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amanda Blumkin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-17 · NE/Eglseder/18&Over4.5M · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ryan Strasil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-14 · NE/ReddingPetersen/18&Over9.0X · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sara McArdle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-06-12 · Erwin/Redding · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Libby Ruf mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-10 · NE/Eglseder/18&Over4.5M · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tyler Osterloo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-07 · NE/ReddingPetersen/18&Over9.0X · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Melissa Darling mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-05 · Erwin/Redding · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Libby Ruf mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
64.3%
9W–5L · 54.9% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5
79.3%
23W–6L · 61.2% of games
5.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
10.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
59.4%
19W–13L · 56.3% of games
9.0mixed
51.5%
17W–16L · 50.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
54 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
22 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer