← Search

Richelle Robinson

Cary, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
263 matches · 125W–138L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Richelle Robinson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history263 matches
W
2026-08-10 · MCP.Hinckley · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Emily Yang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-30 · TOC.Hinckley · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffani Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-23 · MLong-DUR · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-06-22 · MLong-DUR · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-22 · TOC.Hinckley · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Roper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-18 · MLong-DUR · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-16 · MLong-DUR · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-15 · TOC.Hinckley · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica Revels
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-05 · MLong-DUR · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-26 · MLong-DUR · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-24 · MLong.40.3.5-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Beall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-22 · MLong-DUR · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams55 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 31.2% of games
2.5
64.5%
20W–11L · 56.3% of games
3.0
55.2%
48W–39L · 54.4% of games
3.5
15.1%
8W–45L · 32% of games
5.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 52.3% of games
5.5
81.8%
18W–4L · 62.2% of games
6.5
44.1%
15W–19L · 46.7% of games
6.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 52.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
103 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
71 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
44 matches
#3 Singles
8%
20 matches
#1 Singles
5%
13 matches
#2 Singles
4%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe