← Search

Tiffani Campbell

Apex, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
206 matches · 86W–120L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tiffani Campbell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history206 matches
L
2026-09-03 · ANP.Keelor · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Leslie Roper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-03 · MCP.Hinckley · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michele Mulcahy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-07-30 · TOC.Hinckley · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richelle Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-06 · TOC.Hinckley · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michele Mulcahy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-04-27 · TOC.Anderson · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leslie Roper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-04-23 · ACP.Keelor · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-17 · MCP.Hinckley · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michele Mulcahy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
N/A
2026-04-13 · TOC.Anderson · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allison Keelor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-09 · ACP.Keelor · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michele Mulcahy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-03-27 · TOC.Anderson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cheryl Morgenstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-03-24 · ACP.Keelor · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Parrish
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-03-23 · TOC.Anderson · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
48%
24W–26L · 49.8% of games
3.0
45.3%
34W–41L · 45% of games
3.5
8.3%
1W–11L · 23% of games
5.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 45.9% of games
5.5
46.7%
21W–24L · 48.3% of games
6.5
20%
3W–12L · 41.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 28% of the time
#2 Doubles
28%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
54 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
49 matches
#1 Singles
12%
25 matches
#2 Singles
7%
14 matches
#3 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal