← Search

Richard Price

— year-end
126 matches · 59W–67L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Richard Price to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history126 matches
W
2026-04-12 · 40-LOVE · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Steve Brandt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Raymond Tapio / Peter Smith
2026-03-29 · 40-LOVE · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeffrey Friedman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-03-15 · 40-LOVE · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeffrey Friedman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-03-14 · Sorry Not Sorry · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Leuenberger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-07 · Sorry Not Sorry · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Leuenberger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
Danilo Fernando / Raymond Tapio
2026-01-24 · 40-LOVE · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kenneth Geary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2025-03-30 · Jang · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Steve Brandt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
Philip Smith / Roger Hubeli
2025-03-23 · Jang · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Steve Brandt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-03-16 · Jang · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Steve Brandt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
Roger Hubeli / Jeremy Mauro
2025-03-01 · Jang · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kenneth Geary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-02-23 · Jang · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Steve Brandt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-02-16 · Jang · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ben Jung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
Teams21 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
43.2%
16W–21L · 46.6% of games
3.5
30%
3W–7L · 33.5% of games
6.0mixed
52.9%
27W–24L · 50.8% of games
7.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 42.6% of games
7.5mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 60.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
37 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
35 matches
#1 Male Doubles
2%
2 matches
#2 Male Doubles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King