← Search

Richard Ingraham

Syracuse, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
175 matches · 134W–41L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Richard Ingraham to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history175 matches
W
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Rocco Edwards championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Rocco Edwards championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-22 · #1 Male Singles · 0.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-19 · Syracuse: Geary/ Nelligan · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Veronica Hotaling mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-12 · Syracuse: Geary/ Nelligan · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Heidi Howard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
John Murray / David Strack
2026-07-08 · #2 Male Doubles · 0.0 · with Yi Zhang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Zunli Lu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-21 · Syracuse: Geary/ Nelligan · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Heidi Howard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marc Hann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-06-13 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-06-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Jansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcus J Brooks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
86.8%
33W–5L · 65.8% of games
3.0
84.2%
16W–3L · 68.1% of games
3.5
55%
11W–9L · 50.6% of games
4.0
40%
2W–3L · 45.4% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 60.7% of games
7.0mixed
88.9%
40W–5L · 66% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
45 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
33 matches
#1 Male Singles
11%
20 matches
#1 Male Doubles
7%
12 matches
#2 Male Doubles
5%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer