← Search

Amanda Barritt

Celebration, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
311 matches · 186W–125L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Amanda Barritt to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history311 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Lake Cane-Barritt · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rikki Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-09-13 · Lake Cane-Barritt · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ericah Claycomb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-13 · Lake Cane-Barritt · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Isabella Marcano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-09-03 · Lake Cane-Barritt · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rikki Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-08-20 · Sanlando-Krejci · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cindy Ortiz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-08-11 · Lake Cane-Barritt · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Isabella Marcano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-08-02 · Lake Cane-Barritt · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rikki Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-01 · Lake Cane-Barritt · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rachel Holt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-28 · Lake Cane-Barritt · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Genell Ferrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-27 · Sanlando-Krejci · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Pamela Bravo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-07-21 · Lake Cane-Barritt · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ericah Claycomb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-07 · Lake Cane-Barritt · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Katherine Applegarth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams60 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
46.7%
7W–8L · 48.9% of games
3.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 50% of games
3.5
95%
19W–1L · 66.3% of games
4.0
78.1%
57W–16L · 60.8% of games
4.5
18.6%
8W–35L · 36.7% of games
6.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 60.1% of games
7.5
72.7%
16W–6L · 58.1% of games
8.5
23.1%
6W–20L · 42.6% of games
8.0mixed
45.7%
16W–19L · 50.5% of games
9.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
116 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
92 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
90 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches
#2 Female Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert