← Search

Maria Alfonzo

— year-end
99 matches · 78W–21L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Maria Alfonzo to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history99 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Lake Cane-Alfonzo · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Pennington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-21 · Sanlando-Pennington · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-09 · #2 Doubles · with Lucianna Lima championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Kelly Baker championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Kelly Baker championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-02 · Lake Cane-Alfonzo · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-01 · Lake Cane-Alfonzo · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracy Jay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-28 · Lake Cane-Alfonzo · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Natalie Beavers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-27 · Sanlando-Krejci · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cindy Ortiz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-21 · Lake Cane-Alfonzo · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Shannon Sotto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-17 · Lake Cane-Alfonzo · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren Pennington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-07 · Lake Cane-Alfonzo · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Natalie Beavers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
Teams26 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
80%
4W–1L · 64.6% of games
3.5
80%
20W–5L · 59.3% of games
4.0
75.8%
25W–8L · 60.6% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 48.1% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
100%
7W–0L · 59.6% of games
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
19 matches
#1 Singles
4%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer