← Search

Chad Cox

Raleigh, NC
3.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
104 matches · 31W–73L · seasons 2017–2026

Captains: add Chad Cox to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history104 matches
L
2026-08-20 · Da.McNulty40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ben Desonglo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
Brendan DeMacy
2026-05-27 · Jo.Williamson18S · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
N/A
2026-05-11 · Jo.Williamson18A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kenneth Lesher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-29 · Pe.Flack40A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with David McNulty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-25 · Jo.Williamson18A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kenneth Lesher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-04-22 · Pe.Flack40A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with James Stiegler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-18 · Jo.Williamson18A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kenneth Lesher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-04-11 · Jo.Williamson18A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kenneth Lesher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
Geoffrey Lewis / David Richardson
2026-03-28 · Jo.Williamson18A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kenneth Lesher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-25 · Pe.Flack40A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kenneth Lesher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-03-14 · Jo.Williamson18A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peter Flack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-11 · Pe.Flack40A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Rosenberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
33.3%
28W–56L · 40.4% of games
5.5
20%
2W–8L · 36% of games
6.5
10%
1W–9L · 30.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
37 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
10 matches
#2 Singles
9%
9 matches
#3 Singles
9%
9 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova