← Search

James Stiegler

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
35 matches · 10W–25L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add James Stiegler to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history35 matches
L
2026-07-08 · Jo.Williamson18S · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-25 · Jo.Williamson18A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peter Flack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-04-22 · Pe.Flack40A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chad Cox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-15 · Pe.Flack40A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with David McNulty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-11 · Jo.Williamson18A · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-03-25 · Pe.Flack40A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Todd Sprouse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-14 · Jo.Williamson18A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Raul Louzao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-07 · Jo.Williamson18A · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-02-28 · Jo.Williamson18A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vaibhav Parmar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-10-05 · MCP.Ratliff · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dan Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-09-28 · MCP.Ratliff · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stephen Fu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-09-21 · MCP.Ratliff · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Francisco Burbano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 45.2% of games
3.5
30%
6W–14L · 44.9% of games
6.5
0%
0W–5L · 31.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 29% of the time
#3 Doubles
29%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
8 matches
#3 Singles
11%
4 matches
#1 Singles
6%
2 matches
#2 Singles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe