← Search

Natali Wiedemann

— year-end
37 matches · 21W–16L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Natali Wiedemann to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history37 matches
L
2026-07-10 · Lagoon Killingsworth · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chessie Mann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-30 · Lagoon Killingsworth · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cathy Prueitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-05-19 · Lagoon MGM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erika McKay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-14 · Lagoon MGM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erika McKay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-11 · Lagoon- Holmes · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vanessa Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-04 · Lagoon- Holmes · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margaret Herd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-03-01 · MG Holmes · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Antonio Holmes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-01-28 · Lagoon- Holmes · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Holly Adcock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-01-21 · Lagoon- Holmes · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Holly Adcock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
Ann Osten / Christine Cook
2025-12-06 · Selma - Skier · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Holly Adcock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
Christine Cook / Ann Osten
2025-11-22 · Selma - Skier · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Holly Adcock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Jennifer Henderson / Donna Sullivan
2025-11-19 · Lagoon Holmes · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
Teams17 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
61.5%
16W–10L · 54.4% of games
7.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 39.7% of games
4.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 58.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
6 matches
#1 Singles
14%
5 matches
#2 Singles
8%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova