← Search

Chandrika Maliyagoda

Tucson, AZ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
148 matches · 62W–86L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Chandrika Maliyagoda to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history148 matches
L
2026-05-30 · Aces · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
Elizabeth Taylor
2026-05-16 · Aced · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-09 · Aces · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-25 · Aces · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-04-22 · Aces · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristina Burdine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-04-21 · Aced · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suo Ji
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-18 · Aces · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-11 · #3 Doubles · with Kathryn Verna championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-25 · 40 & Fierce Aces · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Cunningham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-03-21 · 40 & Fierce Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Burch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-28 · Aces after Forty · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suo Ji
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-21 · Aces after Forty · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Cunningham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
94.4%
17W–1L · 65.2% of games
3.5
48.6%
34W–36L · 49.4% of games
4.0
15.4%
6W–33L · 33.6% of games
7.0mixed
25%
5W–15L · 42% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 36% of the time
#1 Singles
36%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
29 matches
#2 Singles
20%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe