← Search

Jody Little

Tucson, AZ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
76 matches · 46W–30L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Jody Little to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history76 matches
W
2026-05-06 · Elconics · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Perrelle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · Elconics · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Trina Callie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-04-29 · Elconics · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elaine Overlund
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-04-18 · Elconics · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynne Tomasa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-16 · Mixed Plate · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karl Sprague mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-04-04 · Elconics · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Perrelle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-01 · Elconics · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elaine Overlund
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-03-29 · Mixed Plate · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joe Parker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-03-21 · Sweet & Sassy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Trina Callie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-18 · Sweet & Sassy · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Trina Callie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-07 · Sweet & Sassy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elaine Overlund
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-02-25 · Sweet & Sassy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Perrelle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
61.9%
39W–24L · 54.7% of games
4.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 45.3% of games
3.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 54.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
41%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
4%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer