← Search

Jeff Burrell

Fort Mill, SC
4.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
74 matches · 43W–31L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jeff Burrell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history74 matches
L
2026-03-05 · MCTA40/Hart/RHTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Snearly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L
2025-06-23 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Moll mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
Jerome Lawson / RK Reddy
2025-04-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Craig Hart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-02-23 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kirkland Hardin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
Joe Peele / Chris Reilly
2024-03-23 · #2 Doubles · with Chad Gluff championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
Andrew Backus / Scott Saffer
2024-03-22 · #3 Doubles · with Patrick Nitsche championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
Jeff Yearwood / Alvin Gilless
2024-03-22 · #3 Doubles · with David Snearly championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2023-11-10 · #2 Doubles · with David Snearly championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
Charles Claus / Jason Smith
2023-10-29 · #3 Doubles · with David Snearly championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
Brad Hardin / Brad Meredith
2023-10-28 · #1 Doubles · with Patrick Nitsche championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 0-1
W
2023-10-28 · #3 Doubles · with David Snearly championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2023-09-10 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Patrick Nitsche
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
76.5%
13W–4L · 61.6% of games
4.0
42.9%
6W–8L · 52.7% of games
7.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 62.3% of games
9.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 50.7% of games
4.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 50.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
16 matches
#1 Singles
5%
4 matches
#1 Male Doubles
4%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert