← Search

Ryan Staiert

West Des Moines, IA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
127 matches · 82W–45L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Ryan Staiert to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history127 matches
L
2026-07-21 · Johnson: Oak View Middle School · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Quincy Pullen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-14 · Johnson: Oak View Middle School · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Quincy Pullen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-23 · Johnson: Oak View Middle School · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Quincy Pullen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-16 · Johnson: Oak View Middle School · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Quincy Pullen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-03 · Whipp · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amy Upright mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Luis Omana
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Luis Omana
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Michael Boyer / Keren Terry
2026-04-12 · Whipp · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amy Upright mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-10 · Blume: Genesis · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-01-03 · Baeth & Staiert: Life Time · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-12-13 · Baeth & Staiert: Life Time · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-12-13 · Blume: Genesis · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
70%
21W–9L · 58.1% of games
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
78.3%
36W–10L · 59.7% of games
4.5
33.3%
8W–16L · 46% of games
8.0mixed
57.9%
11W–8L · 47.7% of games
9.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 63.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 28% of the time
#2 Doubles
28%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
30 matches
#1 Singles
18%
23 matches
#2 Singles
6%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King