← Search

Vitaly Pecharsky

Ames, IA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
222 matches · 107W–115L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Vitaly Pecharsky to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history222 matches
W
2026-07-21 · Pecharsky & Johnson: Ames · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jack Edwards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-23 · Pecharsky & Johnson: Ames · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Harrison Hawbaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
Michael Boyer / Adam Rothert
2026-06-16 · Pecharsky & Johnson: Ames · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Harrison Hawbaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Caden Launderville
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matt Den Adel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joao Freiria
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
Bryce Johnson / Ethan Humble
2026-03-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Judka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
Kyle Knecht / Emily Adams
2026-02-22 · DTC #1 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mindy Creamer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joao Freiria
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-02-01 · DTC #1 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mindy Creamer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
Adam Rothert / Lane Luhring
2026-01-17 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Noah Jean
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-01-10 · Blume: Genesis · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ronald Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
66.7%
16W–8L · 56.5% of games
4.5
39.7%
46W–70L · 47.5% of games
5.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 42.1% of games
7.5mixed
50%
4W–4L · 52.6% of games
8.0mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 55.4% of games
8.5mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 50.2% of games
9.0mixed
51.7%
15W–14L · 51.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
83 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
54 matches
#1 Singles
8%
17 matches
#2 Singles
4%
8 matches
#3 Male Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer