← Search

Deborah Nunley

Powell, OH
3.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
150 matches · 46W–104L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Deborah Nunley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history150 matches
W
Deb Clay / Pamela Purtee
2026-04-24 · Wedgewood · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Connie Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-04-10 · Wedgewood · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-03-20 · Wedgewood · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Russell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-5
L
2026-03-13 · Wedgewood · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Caroline Rocco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
Emily Adams
2026-02-27 · Wedgewood · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-20 · Wedgewood · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wendy Haddow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-02-13 · Wedgewood · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allison Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-02-06 · Wedgewood · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-01-30 · Wedgewood · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-2, 0-1
L
2026-01-09 · Wedgewood · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Russell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-3
L
Erin McGraw / Suzanne Smith
2025-12-19 · Wedgewood · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Russell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-19 · Wedgewood · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Margo Simmons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
40.6%
13W–19L · 49.5% of games
3.0
30.2%
26W–60L · 42% of games
5.5
50%
4W–4L · 45.5% of games
6.0
0%
0W–6L · 27.7% of games
6.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 37% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
36 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova