← Search

Isil Erel Koksal

New Albany, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
97 matches · 40W–57L · seasons 2021–2027

Captains: add Isil Erel Koksal to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history97 matches
W
2026-09-11 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-18 · Scarborough 3 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Beth Gittins
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-2
L
2026-05-08 · Racquet Club 4 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
Heather Evans / Jill Gross
2026-04-27 · Scarborough 3 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Traci Golis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-24 · Racquet Club 4 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-20 · Scarborough 2 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pam Gurwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-12 · Scarborough 2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erica Rozanczyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
Julie Jones / Deborah Nunley
2026-04-10 · Racquet Club 4 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cheryl Carey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-03-29 · Scarborough 2 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pam Gurwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-03-15 · Scarborough 2 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mina Khorrami
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-06 · Racquet Club 4 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Danielle Scheschuk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-5
W
2026-03-02 · Scarborough 3 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Robin Larivey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
39.5%
30W–46L · 45.6% of games
3.5
0%
0W–5L · 26.2% of games
6.5
66.7%
10W–5L · 57.6% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
19 matches
#1 Singles
17%
16 matches
#2 Singles
10%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova