← Search

Sarah Sisco

— year-end
107 matches · 52W–55L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Sarah Sisco to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history107 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Breaker/Ward/LR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sydney Breaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
Lydia Hunjan / Holly Sessions
2026-09-03 · Watts/NLR/BP · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shelby Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-08-31 · Lane · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Leah Welker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-08-27 · Lane · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Crystal Pennington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-27 · Stevens/Breaker/LR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sydney Breaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-13 · Watts/Murdock/NLR/BP · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Gates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-22 · Sisoukrath/Benton/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Johnathan Armstrong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-21 · Sisco/LR/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stan Belue mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-20 · Watts/Murdock/NLR/BP · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Haylee Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-16 · Watts/Murdock/NLR/BP · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Haylee Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3
L
2026-07-13 · Watts/Murdock/NLR/BP · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bernadette Stanford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-10 · Sisco/LR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Grant Morshedi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
Teams64 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
41.3%
19W–27L · 48.5% of games
4.0
50%
7W–7L · 46.3% of games
6.5
62.5%
10W–6L · 57.9% of games
7.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 46.7% of games
3.5mixed
55%
11W–9L · 51.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
13 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer