← Search

Sydney Breaker

— year-end
92 matches · 42W–50L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Sydney Breaker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history92 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Breaker/Ward/LR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Sisco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-01 · Breaker/Ward/LR/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Misty Stevens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-27 · Stevens/Breaker/LR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Sisco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-18 · Reding/LR/Reb · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Molly Telford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-5
W
2026-08-13 · Jones/LR/Reb · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jaclyn Bracey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-11 · Reding/LR/Reb · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Castillo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-06 · Reding/LR/Reb · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Althoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-21 · Worley/Breaker/LR/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dean Worley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6
W
2026-07-20 · Jones/LR/Reb · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Hicks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-16 · Jones/LR/Reb · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katelyn Lazenby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-07-14 · Reding/LR/Reb · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Castillo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6
L
2026-07-10 · Worley/Breaker/LR/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dean Worley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
Teams45 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 65.3% of games
3.5
45%
18W–22L · 45.8% of games
4.0
9.1%
1W–10L · 33% of games
5.5
75%
3W–1L · 62.9% of games
6.5
50%
4W–4L · 41.4% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 48.1% of games
4.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
22 matches
#2 Singles
8%
7 matches
#1 Singles
4%
4 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams