← Search

Stephanie Shah

— year-end
79 matches · 49W–30L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Stephanie Shah to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history79 matches
L
2026-09-11 · Team 18 Oak Creek/Thornton-Hark W3.5F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Kendall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · Oak Creek/Thornton-Hark W3.5T · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-20 · Oak Creek/Grubstein W3.5S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-18 · Oak Creek/Thornton-Hark W3.5T · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-06-13 · Oak Creek/Grubstein W3.5S · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-11 · Oak Creek/Thornton-Hark W3.5T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Baldwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-06 · Oak Creek/Grubstein W3.5S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-04 · Oak Creek/Thornton-Hark W3.5T · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-30 · Oak Creek/Grubstein W3.5S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-28 · Oak Creek/Thornton-Hark W3.5T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joy Sebold
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-16 · Oak Creek/Grubstein W3.5S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-05-14 · Oak Creek/Thornton-Hark W3.5T · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
Teams37 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
61.6%
45W–28L · 54.3% of games
4.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
34 matches
#1 Singles
38%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
9%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
5 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova