← Search

Paige Shaw

— year-end
22 matches · 12W–10L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Paige Shaw to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history22 matches
L
2026-08-09 · CCGA/Lori Curles · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Burnette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-26 · CCGA/Lori Curles · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Rankin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
Erika Bisesi / Jennifer Lee
2026-07-19 · CCGA/Lori Curles · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Marci High
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-12 · HCC-3.5 (18+) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dani Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-04-09 · HCC-3.5 (18+) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelsea Weldon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
Amy Evans / Madalyn Payne
2026-02-26 · HCC-3.5 (18+) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kayla Rainey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2025-10-02 · HCC 6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Crystie Aultman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2025-09-18 · HCC 6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Crystie Aultman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2025-09-07 · HCC 6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Crystie Aultman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-09-04 · HCC 6.5 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Caroline Bradley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2025-08-11 · Broussard 3.0-4.0 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Samantha Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2025-07-16 · Broussard 3.0-4.0 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Samantha Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-6, 1-0
Teams8 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 52.6% of games
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 51.9% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 57.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
5 matches
#2 Singles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova