← Search

Tina Boykin

— year-end
126 matches · 88W–38L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Tina Boykin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history126 matches
L
2026-09-03 · Tatum 40+ 7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Debbie Foster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
Heidi Clayton / Rachel Jefcoat
2026-08-23 · Stetelman 8.5 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Christa Hataway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-29 · Stetelman 3.5-4.5 · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Regan Rhian Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-07-26 · Bishop Kolbo 40+ 4.0 Mixed · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brendan Fay mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2
W
2026-07-26 · Bishop Kolbo 40+ 4.0 Mixed · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brendan Fay mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
8-3
W
2026-07-19 · Callaway HCC 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jason Boykin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-19 · Callaway HCC 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jason Boykin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-31 · Callaway HCC 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jason Boykin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-07 · Black-HRC-40’s-4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Shemper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-07 · Rodgers-3.5-18's-HRC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Hudson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-04 · Schwartz-3.5-HRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Wise
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-28 · Black-HRC-40’s-4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Gianola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Teams47 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 61.9% of games
3.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 56.9% of games
3.5
84%
21W–4L · 58.8% of games
4.0
56.2%
9W–7L · 51.8% of games
5.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 69.9% of games
6.5
88.9%
16W–2L · 65.4% of games
7.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 54.1% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 51.7% of games
3.5mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 50.6% of games
4.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
22 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova