David Kim
South Pasadena, CA
34 matches · 23W–11L · seasons 2025–2026
Captains: add David Kim to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history34 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2021–2026
BC-AltaVista/AndreaTorng8.0
BC-AltaVista/GaiOdanaka9.0
BC-LLW-ElSeundo/VickyTrinh
BC-LLW-LAKEWOOD/TonyHsu4.5
BC-LLW-Lakewood/TonyHsu
BC-Lakewood/TonyHsu4.5
BC-MiraCosta/VenkTatineni
LA - Back in Black
SGV LLW Noobies- Petrocelli-San Marino HS/SA10/12
SGV Maple Team-Lin-WN-SU10
SGV Mixed Noobies-Taon-San Marino HS-SA10
SGV Noobies A-Han-San Marino HS/SU10
WC SGV Noobies -Han-San Marino HS/SA2/4
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 56.8% of games
4.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 50.9% of games
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 59.1% of games
8.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 56.5% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
4 matches
#1 Singles
9%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.