← Search

Nicholas de Goede

Hermosa Beach, CA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
129 matches · 81W–48L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nicholas de Goede to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history129 matches
L
2026-09-12 · BC-Lakewood/TonyHsu4.5 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Davis Kop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
John Lansville / Kyle Wood
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with York Cheng championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-01 · BC-MiraCosta/JulieAustin9.0 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Julie Austin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
W
N/A
2026-07-25 · BC-MiraCosta/JulieAustin9.0 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Laura McManus mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-11 · LA - Fellowship of the String · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Eric Fandel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-27 · BC-LLW-LAKEWOOD/TonyHsu4.5 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Hermosisima
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-20 · BC-LLW-LAKEWOOD/TonyHsu4.5 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Davis Kop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-13 · BC-LLW-LAKEWOOD/TonyHsu4.5 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-03-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kevin Quinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-02-22 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Julie Austin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kevin Quinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-07 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Anne Bayne mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
10.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.5
62.5%
35W–21L · 54.7% of games
5.0
60%
9W–6L · 55.2% of games
9.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 57.3% of games
10.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
79.2%
19W–5L · 61.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
24 matches
#1 Male Doubles
3%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams