← Search

Brian Leach

Flora, MS
3.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
19 matches · 19W–0L · seasons 2023–2023

Captains: add Brian Leach to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history19 matches
W
2023-09-21 · Myers, Chad · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Clay Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
Ryan Cook / Brycen Witcher
2023-08-24 · Myers, Chad · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Peter Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2023-08-23 · Sims, Jonathan · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lane Clower
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2023-08-10 · Myers, Chad · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Avery Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2023-08-09 · Sims, Jonathan · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2023-07-02 · Sims, Crystal · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Landon McCoy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2023-05-31 · Sims, Crystal · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kellan Clower mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2023-04-23 · Sims, Jonathan · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jonathan Sims
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2023-04-17 · Sims, Jonathan · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Justin Panter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
Taylor Steed / Tyler Carroll
2023-04-10 · Sims, Jonathan · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jonathan Sims
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2023-04-03 · Sims, Jonathan · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chad Biggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2023-03-27 · Sims, Jonathan · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chad Biggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2021–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
100%
12W–0L · 73.7% of games
5.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 74% of the time
#1 Doubles
74%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams