← Search

Andrew Stubbs

Madison, MS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
81 matches · 71W–10L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Andrew Stubbs to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history81 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Walker, Niven · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jonathan Sims
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-08-20 · Walker, Niven · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Roddy Rumbley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-18 · Walker, Niven · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lane Clower
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-04-14 · Sims, Jonathan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Carmody
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-07 · Sims, Jonathan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Conner Fudge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-03-24 · Sims, Jonathan · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-03-23 · Walker, Niven · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Sims
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-02-27 · Walker, Niven · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Haile
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
Tim Davis / Wesley Whitehead
2026-02-09 · Walker, Niven · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bryan Howell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
Adrian Agulto / Randy Harris
2025-10-16 · Walker, Niven · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bryan Howell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2025-10-01 · Walker, Niven · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bryan Howell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2025-09-10 · Walker, Niven · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bryan Howell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
100%
6W–0L · 73.2% of games
3.0
94.4%
17W–1L · 65.3% of games
3.5
100%
14W–0L · 67.7% of games
4.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 60% of games
6.5
100%
11W–0L · 71.8% of games
7.5
80%
8W–2L · 62.2% of games
3.5mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 55.2% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 50.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
18 matches
#1 Singles
15%
12 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova