← Search

Meghan Howell

— year-end
167 matches · 105W–62L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Meghan Howell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history167 matches
W
2026-07-14 · WOB:Awesome:Hoffman/Condurso · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aimee Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-07-09 · WOB:Aces:Hoffman · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara West
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-25 · WOB:Aces:Hoffman · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aimee Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-06-09 · HH:Coleman:Paradie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiani Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · WOB:Aces:Hoffman · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aimee Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-02 · WOB:Awesome:Hoffman/Condurso · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melba Chin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-26 · WOB:Awesome:Hoffman/Condurso · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Condurso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-03-24 · HH:Fortier:LInder · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiani Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-17 · HH:Galvez:Weisberg · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy McManus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-10 · HH:Fortier:LInder · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dalia Paradie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-17 · HH:Galvez:Weisberg · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiani Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L
Shirley Kim / Susan Johnson
2026-02-03 · HH:Fortier:LInder · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Caulton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
Teams42 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
89.7%
26W–3L · 64.8% of games
3.5
70.7%
65W–27L · 56.3% of games
4.0
21.2%
7W–26L · 37.7% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 66.7% of games
7.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 47.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
91 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
33 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova