← Search

Nancy McManus

— year-end
158 matches · 62W–96L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Nancy McManus to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history158 matches
L
2026-06-18 · GH:Brown:RawlskyWillett · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Roberta Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
W
2026-06-04 · GH:Brown:RawlskyWillett · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Roberta Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-26 · HH:Meltzer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Raghav Bansal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-12 · HH:Meltzer · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Darius Paradie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-03-31 · HH:Fortier:LInder · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Senora Linder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-17 · HH:Galvez:Weisberg · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan Howell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-10 · HH:Fortier:LInder · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsay Perrin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-03 · HH:Galvez:Weisberg · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paula Donovan Olsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-02-05 · GH:Brown:Rawlsky-Willett · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paula Donovan Olsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-03 · HH:Galvez:Weisberg · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanna Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-01-29 · HH:Donna'sTribe:O'Brien:Sargent · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paula Donovan Olsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-06 · HH:Galvez:Weisberg · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Weisberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
Teams43 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
52.9%
18W–16L · 50.4% of games
4.0
23.5%
8W–26L · 42.3% of games
7.0
57.7%
15W–11L · 52.1% of games
8.0
23.5%
4W–13L · 41.3% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
35.6%
16W–29L · 46.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
85 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
27 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer