← Search

Kate Bludworth

— year-end
136 matches · 87W–49L · seasons 2021–2027

Captains: add Kate Bludworth to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history136 matches
L
2026-09-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Sullivan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-23 · Court Justice · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Fass
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-05 · High Strung 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mari Boren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · High Strung 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheila Shung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-20 · Couple of Aces · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Rasmussen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-10 · Volley Partons 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqui Gilmore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-07 · High Strung 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mari Boren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-04-25 · High Strung 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with TANIA LESKOVAR-Owens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-03-28 · High Strung 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Olga Wieczorek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-21 · High Strung 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maureen Carlson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-12 · Volley Partons · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maria Luisa Diaz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-22 · High Strung 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maureen Carlson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
Teams20 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
70.8%
51W–21L · 60.3% of games
3.5
52.9%
18W–16L · 52% of games
6.0mixed
62.1%
18W–11L · 53.5% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
67 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
23 matches
#1 Singles
6%
8 matches
#2 Singles
5%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova