← Search

Meghan Nielsen

— year-end
99 matches · 52W–47L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Meghan Nielsen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history99 matches
W
2026-08-15 · Great Aces · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with SHANNON HORTON
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-08-08 · Great Aces · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julie Williford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-30 · Great Shot · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Koellhofer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-26 · Great Aces · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with SHANNON HORTON
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-23 · Great Shot · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liam Fry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-06 · Great Aces 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-16 · Great Aces 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Koellhofer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-14 · Great Gamers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Taylor Cervenka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · Great Aces 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqueline Broaddus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-04-25 · Great Aces 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Koellhofer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-23 · Great Gamers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Taylor Cervenka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-07 · Great Aces 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
71.8%
28W–11L · 58.8% of games
3.5
39.2%
20W–31L · 46.5% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 67.1% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
28 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova