← Search

Alison Nipper

Wilmington, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
25 matches · 12W–13L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Alison Nipper to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history25 matches
W
2026-09-14 · Broach · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Maddie Crumpton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-09-09 · Broach · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christine Tryer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-06 · Broach/Farris 18+ 3.5 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-29 · Broach/Farris 18+ 3.5 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-28 · Gallimore · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-22 · Broach/Farris 18+ 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Becky Farris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-12 · Gallimore · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-03-31 · Gallimore · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricia Melvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-25 · Broach/Farris 18+ 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricia Melvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-24 · Gallimore · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-21 · Broach/Farris 18+ 3.5 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-10-15 · Broach / Farris 18+ 6.5 PVCC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Angelia Gallimore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
43.8%
7W–9L · 42.5% of games
6.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 51% of games
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
7 matches
#2 Singles
24%
6 matches
#1 Singles
20%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer