← Search

Paul Clemens

— year-end
176 matches · 90W–86L · seasons 2021–2027

Captains: add Paul Clemens to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history176 matches
W
Patrick Smith / Nora Swift
2026-09-13 · 3.5 ACC1 Clemens X40F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with VERONICA FIELDS mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-09-11 · 3.5 GK1 Li Cody X18F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lysa Clemens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-16 · 3.5 ACC Zimmer/Berry X18S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Bloom mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-04-02 · 3.5 ACC Berry M18S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Berry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-30 · 3.5 ACC National Anthem M40S · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Darrell Calvert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-29 · 3.5 ACC Clemens X40S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Zimmer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-03-23 · 3.5 ACC National Anthem M40S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Berry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-13 · 3.5 ACC Zimmer/Berry X18S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Calvert mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-06 · 3.5 ACC Zimmer/Berry X18S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Zimmer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-03-05 · 3.5 ACC Berry M18S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tom Thiel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-04 · 3.5 ACC Berry M18S · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bryan Floyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-02 · 3.5 ACC National Anthem M40S · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erik Hoffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Teams35 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 62% of games
3.5
46.3%
31W–36L · 49.7% of games
6.5
85.7%
12W–2L · 61.7% of games
3.5mixed
59.3%
16W–11L · 53.2% of games
6.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 54.2% of games
6.5mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 56% of games
7.0mixed
25%
7W–21L · 42.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
62 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
56 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
51 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova