← Search

Becca Fitzpatrick

Fort Collins, CO
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 55W–15L · seasons 2019–2024

Captains: add Becca Fitzpatrick to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history70 matches
L
2024-05-14 · LT BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Fields
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2024-04-30 · LT BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Susan Boyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2024-04-23 · LT BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Fields
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2024-04-16 · LT BLUE · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2023-08-06 · LVTA ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Seager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
Emily Jones / Sarah Soffe
2023-07-10 · MLF ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Olsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2023-07-03 · MLF ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bethany Seely
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2023-06-23 · LVTA ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Seager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2023-06-19 · LVTA BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Seager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2023-06-05 · MLF ORANGE · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2023-05-31 · LVTA BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Seager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2023-05-29 · MLF PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Seager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
75%
3W–1L · 57.3% of games
3.5
92.9%
13W–1L · 74% of games
4.0
75%
30W–10L · 60.7% of games
4.5
50%
2W–2L · 44% of games
7.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 76% of games
9.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
11 matches
#1 Singles
13%
9 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova