← Search

Amy Wright

Canton, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
42 matches · 32W–10L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Amy Wright to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history42 matches
W
2026-05-28 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paula Link
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 6-4
W
2025-07-24 · Cherokee/Laura Baker · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eve Tubman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4
W
2025-07-17 · Cherokee/Laura Baker · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandy Banet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-07-15 · River Green (Cathy Cox)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eve Tubman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2025-07-10 · Cherokee/Laura Baker · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandy Banet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2025-07-08 · River Green (Cathy Cox)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eve Tubman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 6-4
W
2025-06-17 · River Green (Cathy Cox)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandy Banet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-06-04 · Cherokee/Laura Baker · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Lees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
Danielle Smith / Christi Fiorentini
2025-05-15 · Cherokee/Laura Baker · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eve Tubman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-02-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eve Tubman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-01-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandy Banet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 6-2
L
Robin Hovanec / Danielle Smith
2025-01-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gina Treanor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
75.6%
31W–10L · 57.9% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 76% of the time
#1 Doubles
76%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
2 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer