← Search

Jean Skogen

Waleska, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
31 matches · 14W–17L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Jean Skogen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history31 matches
L
2026-06-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Mixon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pam Gzehoviak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-12-04 · Bridgemill - Ehrlich · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Ehrlich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2025-11-20 · Bridgemill - Ehrlich · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Mixon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-11-13 · Bridgemill - Ehrlich · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pam Gressly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
Katie Kennedy / Sheri Adams
2025-07-10 · Bridgemill - Enrlich · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pam Gzehoviak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 0-6
L
2025-06-04 · Bridgemill - Enrlich · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Mixon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-01-13 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teresa Keel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 6-7
L
2025-01-04 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with TRICIA ONeill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2024-12-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Vecsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2024-11-09 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with TRICIA ONeill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2024-08-04 · Bridgemill - Whittle · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brittney Poff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
52%
13W–12L · 49% of games
4.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 43.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 61% of the time
#3 Doubles
61%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
7%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
2 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer