← Search

Emily Rapoza

Mobile, AL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
88 matches · 54W–34L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Emily Rapoza to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history88 matches
W
2026-07-21 · MTC - Rapoza 6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Samantha Christopher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-07-16 · MTC - Sasser/Russell 7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jessica Winck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-14 · MTC - Rapoza 6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kathleen Rees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-25 · MTC - Sasser/Russell 7.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Blakely Prine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-10 · MTC - Rapoza 6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carolyn Simmons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-04 · MTC - Sasser/Russell 7.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Blakely Prine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-05-27 · MO - Rapoza/Jones Mixed 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Darius Bennett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-10 · MO - Rapoza/Jones Mixed 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Spencer Nunn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-04-12 · MO - Rapoza/Jones Mixed 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vincent Sciame mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-28 · MTC - Russell · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Taylor DeMouy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-07 · MTC - Russell · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Hannahan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-05 · MTC - Rapoza 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hannah Neubauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams75 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
70.6%
24W–10L · 60.6% of games
4.0
26.3%
5W–14L · 43.8% of games
6.5
70%
7W–3L · 64% of games
7.5
70%
7W–3L · 53.4% of games
3.5mixed
78.6%
11W–3L · 60.6% of games
4.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
23 matches
#2 Singles
8%
7 matches
#1 Singles
7%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams