← Search

Leigh Crowley

— year-end
56 matches · 32W–24L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Leigh Crowley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
L
2026-07-29 · MTC - Middleton · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Courtney Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · MTC - Middleton · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nadine Anez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-23 · MTC - Middleton · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Courtney Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-03-04 · MTC - Terrell · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-5
L
2026-02-28 · MTC - Huettemann · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Pennington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-25 · MTC - Terrell · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-02-24 · MTC - Hannahan · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lizzie Meacham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-10 · MTC - Hannahan · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Helen Garstecki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-02-03 · MTC - Hannahan · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lizzie Meacham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-01-28 · MTC - Terrell · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Hannahan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-01-28 · MTC - Terrell · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Garstecki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-01-27 · MTC - Hannahan · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Helen Garstecki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Teams16 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
72.2%
13W–5L · 64% of games
3.0
37.5%
9W–15L · 43.5% of games
3.5
75%
3W–1L · 43.5% of games
5.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 61.7% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
12 matches
#1 Singles
9%
5 matches
#2 Singles
7%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert