Jason Meesseman
Chesterfield, MI
185 matches · 89W–96L · seasons 2019–2025
Captains: add Jason Meesseman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history185 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-5
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2025
1PEACH- White 75 COMBO MEN F2
1PEACH-GAINES 70MIX 18&O SEM F2
1PEACH-GAINES 8.0 MIXED 40&O SEM F2
3PEACH-SCHAEFER 40M TH 40&O SEM F2
1PEACH-SCHAEFER AD40&O TH 40 MEN SEM F2
2PEACH-WHITE 75MEN SEM F1
3PEACH-GAINES 7.0 MIXED 40&O SEM F2
4PEACH-GAINES 8.0 MIXED 40&O SEM F2
4PEACH-ITCHON 18&O TU 40 MEN SEM F1
4PEACH-MAZUR 18&O MIX 8.0 SEM F4
6PEACH-GAINES 18&O MIX 7.0 SEM F2
1PEACH-ITCHON AD18&O 40M TU SEM F3
1PEACH-MAZUR MIX18&O 80 SEM F3
2PEACH-GAINES MIX18&O 70 SEM F4
2PEACH-GAINES Mixed 40&O 7.0 SEM F3
3PEACH-MEESSEMAN AD40&O 40M TH SEM F2
4PEACH-GAINES Mixed 40&O 8.0 SEM F2
3PEACH-GAINES 7.0 18&O MIXED SEM F2
4PEACH-GAINES 8.0 mix 40&O SEM f2
4PEACH-SELLERS 75 MEN COMBO SEM F2
5PEACH-GAINES 7.0 mix 40&O SEM f2
5PEACH-MEESSEMAN 40M 40&O AD THURS SEM F2
6PEACH-GAINES 8.0 18&O MIXED SEM F4
1PEACH-GAINES 8.0 18&O MIXED SEM F4
2PEACH-HOMBREBUENO 75 MEN SEM F1
3PEACH-GAINES 7.0 18&O MIXED SEM F5
3PEACH-HOCH 7.0 40&O Mixed SEM F1
3PEACH-LATTIE 85M COMBO SEM F1
4PEACH-GAINES 8.0 40&O Mixed SEM F2
4PEACH-MEESSEMAN 40M 40&O AD THURS SEM F2
5PEACH-TIPTON 45M 18&O AD WED SEM F2
6PEACH-SELLERS 40M 18&O AD TUES SEM F3
7PEACH-HOMBREBUENO M tri-level 35 40 45 SEM
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.0
53.4%
31W–27L · 52.2% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
57.1%
12W–9L · 51.6% of games
8.0mixed
29.2%
7W–17L · 44.5% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
96 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
67 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
21 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.