← Search

Amir Kaki

Birmingham, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
37 matches · 22W–15L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Amir Kaki to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history37 matches
L
2026-06-18 · FAC-Byer 40s 4.0M F1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Lim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-11 · FAC-Byer 40s 4.0M F1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Howard Weingarden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-21 · FAC-Byer 40s 4.0M F1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Millard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-14 · FAC-Byer 40s 4.0M F1 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-11 · BT-Alkhalil LOW MEN TRI F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Fares Alsawah
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
Nathan Hendrix / Ryan Hagen
2026-03-21 · BT-Alkhalil LOW MEN TRI F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michel Hanna
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-02-22 · BT-Alkhalil LOW MEN TRI F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michel Hanna
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
L
John Hughes / Elijah Parsons
2026-02-07 · BT-Alkhalil LOW MEN TRI F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jin Woo Park
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2025-06-19 · 4FAC-BYER 40M TH 40&O SEM F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jay Dalal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-05 · 4FAC-BYER 40M TH 40&O SEM F2 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
Stas Moldavsky
2025-05-29 · 4FAC-BYER 40M TH 40&O SEM F2 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W
2024-06-27 · 3FAC-BYER AD40&O TH 40 MEN SEM F3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jay Dalal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
100%
5W–0L · 61% of games
4.0
38.1%
8W–13L · 46.9% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 27% of the time
#2 Doubles
27%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
9 matches
#1 Singles
22%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova