← Search

Jacqueline Sinclair Parker

Rochester, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
80 matches · 27W–53L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Jacqueline Sinclair Parker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
L
2025-07-16 · Honey Deuce · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Krenzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-10 · Honey Deuce · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-06-12 · Honey Deuce · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Krenzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-29 · Honey Deuce · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Krenzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-04-27 · Honey Deuce · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carolyn Nutting
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-04-11 · Mixed Up 55 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ron Dyson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-03-29 · Mixed Up 55 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Tran mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-03-09 · Honey Deuce · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanne Parkes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-03-01 · Honey Deuce · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joanne Parkes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-02-23 · Honey Deuce · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carolyn Nutting
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-08-06 · Boughter · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanne Parkes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2024-07-30 · Boughter · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanne Parkes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2020–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
44.4%
8W–10L · 48.9% of games
3.5
20%
3W–12L · 35.9% of games
4.0
6.7%
1W–14L · 23.2% of games
7.0
25%
1W–3L · 35.4% of games
8.0
25%
1W–3L · 40% of games
6.0mixed
81.8%
9W–2L · 65.8% of games
7.0mixed
18.2%
2W–9L · 35.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
12 matches
#1 Singles
5%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert