← Search

Joanne Parkes

Rochester, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
132 matches · 63W–69L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Joanne Parkes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history132 matches
W
Yvonne Case / Sandra Couture
2026-08-13 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Martha Kohn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-11 · ROC: Chicks with Sticks · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Savage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Neerja Bhatnagar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-06 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Caroline Burton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-06 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Neerja Bhatnagar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-04 · ROC: Chicks with Sticks · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Savage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-04 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Neerja Bhatnagar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-02 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Neerja Bhatnagar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-31 · Midtown · #2 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Susan Weinberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-28 · ROC: Chicks with Sticks · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Savage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Neerja Bhatnagar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-24 · Midtown · #3 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Astride Schifano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 54.1% of games
3.5
57.1%
32W–24L · 51.3% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0
53.8%
21W–18L · 49.8% of games
8.0
0%
0W–9L · 18.8% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 47.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
58 matches
#1 Doubles
37%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
17 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
3 matches
#3 Female Doubles
2%
3 matches
#2 Female Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams