← Search

Sang Hyun Lim

Landisville, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
204 matches · 98W–106L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sang Hyun Lim to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history204 matches
W
2026-08-23 · Hempfield String Theory 40+ - Roeder · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Roeder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-08-18 · Hempfield String Theory 40+ - Roeder · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-11 · Hempfield String Theory 40+ - Roeder · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-09 · Hempfield String Theory 40+ - Roeder · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-04 · Hempfield String Theory 40+ - Roeder · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-28 · Hempfield String Theory 40+ - Roeder · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-07-14 · Hempfield String Theory 18+ - Roeder · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-06-27 · Hempfield String Theory 40+ - Roeder · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-03 · Hempfield String Theory 18+ - Roeder · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-06-02 · Hempfield String Theory 40+ - Roeder · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with NICK DOWNEY
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-05-16 · Hempfield String Theory 18+ - Roeder · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-04-11 · #2 Doubles · with Bonnie Weaver championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
70.7%
41W–17L · 54.4% of games
4.0
28.2%
11W–28L · 44% of games
4.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 43.2% of games
8.0
46.2%
6W–7L · 53.3% of games
7.0mixed
51%
26W–25L · 50% of games
8.0mixed
25%
4W–12L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
80 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
42 matches
#1 Singles
20%
40 matches
#2 Singles
11%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe