← Search

Jay Rosenthal

Lancaster, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
273 matches · 150W–123L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Jay Rosenthal to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history273 matches
L
2026-08-23 · LTYC - Stauffer/Stover · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-13 · Hempfield Fireballers - Baumer · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wilson Pipkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-12 · Hempfield Fireballers - Baumer · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with NICK DOWNEY
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-12 · Hempfield The Good Guys - Baumer · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kris Geller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-11 · Hempfield The Good Guys - Baumer · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with ANTHONY KURY
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-04 · LTYC - Stauffer/Stover · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-28 · LTYC - Stauffer/Stover · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Steed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-27 · Hempfield Fire in the Hole - Baumer · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Donald Danser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-25 · LTYC - Stauffer/Stover · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gregg Pearson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-25 · LTYC - Stauffer/Stover · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Saul Cohen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-24 · Hempfield Fireballers - Baumer · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with NICK DOWNEY
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-23 · Hempfield Great Wall of Fire - Baumer · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams72 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
69%
29W–13L · 56.4% of games
3.5
33.3%
7W–14L · 44.1% of games
6.0
75.6%
34W–11L · 58% of games
7.0
48.4%
15W–16L · 50.1% of games
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0
40%
6W–9L · 49.1% of games
6.0mixed
69%
29W–13L · 59.1% of games
7.0mixed
34%
16W–31L · 44.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
78 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
76 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
76 matches
#1 Singles
11%
29 matches
#2 Singles
4%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer