← Search

Denise Reilly

Media, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
126 matches · 75W–51L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Denise Reilly to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history126 matches
W
Monica Whitcomb / Betty Angelucci
2026-09-09 · Super Slice Girls · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Diane Janiec
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-08 · Valley Creek · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Janiec
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · Valley Creek · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Wertz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-22 · Super Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-08 · Super Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Janiec
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-01 · Super Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Janiec
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · Racquettes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with MaryEllen Healy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-24 · Super Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Janiec
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-21 · Valley Creek · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Janiec
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-20 · Racquettes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Rosenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-17 · Super Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Janiec
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-07 · Valley Creek · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Senko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 41.4% of games
3.5
45.8%
22W–26L · 51.1% of games
6.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
74.2%
46W–16L · 58.8% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 59.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
40%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
24 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams