← Search

Julie Senko

WEST CHESTER, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
240 matches · 100W–140L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Julie Senko to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history240 matches
W
2026-09-06 · Notorious K.I.M. · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jodi Knapp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-2
L
2026-09-01 · Notorious K.I.M. · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Roniece DuPont
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-18 · West Chester · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Smyth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-11 · West Chester · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lori Romano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-04 · West Chester · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Smyth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-28 · Notorious K.I.M. · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Leida
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · with Lois Kester championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-14 · West Chester · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lori Romano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-07-06 · PennOaks · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Loraine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-4
W
2026-07-02 · PennOaks · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Krzeminski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Jennifer Roberts / Beth Dietrich
2026-06-30 · Notorious K.I.M. · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-29 · Miss Hits Spring · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ayako Watanabe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
25%
1W–3L · 45.7% of games
3.5
66.7%
20W–10L · 55.1% of games
4.0
37%
37W–63L · 44.6% of games
7.0
76.9%
20W–6L · 60.2% of games
8.0
31.2%
5W–11L · 46% of games
7.0mixed
48%
12W–13L · 49.3% of games
8.0mixed
6.7%
2W–28L · 34.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
104 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
67 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
51 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
14 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova